With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

The Architecture of the Shopping Mall Shaped by Racism, Surveillance

There are a handful of shopping malls from my youth that don’t look the same as they once did. In high school, I walked with friends to the Westside Pavilion to buy pins and leggings at Hot Topic then feast on Panda Express. But since then, it has shuttered and is now slated to become a Google campus. I spent weekends at the Crenshaw Mall getting my eyebrows waxed by a woman who did so quickly and efficiently, asking me how school was going. I got my second ear piercing at Claire’s next door and ordered countless burgers from Rally’s.

In the early 2000s, mall renovations changed the interior into a glossier version of what I remember, including spaces for yoga classes. It’s since been sold to a developer, after the efforts of activists in the Downtown Crenshaw group over the last couple of years to stop the sale to a previous developer. The list goes on. 

The mall has seen many changes and iterations as of late, but it’s helpful to know the history to understand why. Architecture critic Alexandra Lange’s Meet Me by the Fountain examines the unfolding of the American obsession with creating the ideal shopping space, which largely hinges on the work of architect Victor Gruen starting in the 1950s. 

The term “mall,” Lange explains, takes its origins from London’s Pall Mall street, a “long, linear course, really an alley, at the heart of the city” that was used to play an early version of croquet called pall-mall. Lange walks the readers through the ways in which mall layouts, building materials, parking lots, controlled temperatures, lighting, and other factors changed with the ideas of what makes a shopping space ideal — including a walking area for people exercising, or ice skating rinks — and the nostalgia that eventually tinges its evolution. (Plus, there are some fascinating detours, like the creation of Muzak and the panic over arcades). These spaces were created as a sort of alternative to the usual chaos of rapidly growing neighborhoods, particularly downtown areas.

Well-known architects have taken on malls as projects; I had no idea that Frank Gehry worked on Santa Monica Place, another of my haunts in those teenage years. In the 1940s, Architectural Forum asked architects to envision a “new master plan” for Syracuse, New York; Gruen and designer Elsie Krummeck presented their idea for “a neighborhood shopping center” but were initially met with some pushback, not uncommon for the time. Everyone from critics to people residing in these cities had an opinion on the way malls should look; yet, as the model evolved, the association of malls with innovation waned. They were seen as low-brow, simply areas for consumerism; even Gehry admitted he didn’t enjoy working on Santa Monica Place. Some developers tried to keep the word “mall” out of a shopping center’s name. 

Read entire article at Hyperallergic