With support from the University of Richmond

History News Network

History News Network puts current events into historical perspective. Subscribe to our newsletter for new perspectives on the ways history continues to resonate in the present. Explore our archive of thousands of original op-eds and curated stories from around the web. Join us to learn more about the past, now.

Marvin Olasky/Peter Olasky: Miers Roots Are Not Ivy League

[MARVIN OLASKY is a University of Texas professor and editor in chief of World, a weekly news magazine. PETER OLASKY is a Manhattan lawyer.]

Q: WHAT DOES Harriet Miers, a highly successful lawyer, longtime member of Valley View Christian Church in Dallas and confidant of the president of the United States, want more than anything else?

A: The approval of the faculty of Yale Law School.

Or at least that is the fear among conservatives. They worry that although Miers is believed to be a pro-life evangelical conservative, she -- like David Souter and Anthony Kennedy before her -- will be seduced by liberalism. As former Bush speechwriter David Frum noted after Miers was nominated, "The pressures on a Supreme Court justice to shift leftward are intense." Frum noted "the sweet little inducements -- the flattery, the invitations to conferences in Austria and Italy, the lectureships at Yale and Harvard -- that come to judges who soften and crumble."

Ah, yes, the sweet little inducements: Washington dinner parties, laudatory editorials from the nation's great liberal newspapers and, perhaps most important, praise from the smug savants back at dear old Yale or Harvard. Many leading lawyers never forget their roots in the Ivy League, where all-knowing professors throw laurels on judges who "get it" and scorn those who don't. Forget Austria: It takes a very strong (or very principled) constitution to do without that intellectual flattery.

But perhaps that makes Miers the perfect candidate. Perhaps it takes someone who did not go to Harvard or Yale and has never seemed to care. Miers went to law school at Southern Methodist University, which, although a well-respected institution, was unlikely to have been a bastion of progressive thought when she entered it in 1970.

As a result, she likely avoided the flaying of conservative justices that would have been tattooed in the minds of most members of today's Supreme Court. (Five out of the nine justices, including Souter and Kennedy and the new chief justice, John Roberts, attended Harvard Law School. One, Clarence Thomas, went to Yale Law School.)

Nor did Miers enter the world of the East Coast establishment after law school. Instead of fleeing the conservative confines of Dallas for New York City or Washington, she joined a small, corporate law firm and built a successful career as a corporate litigator. Unlike in New York, where verbalizing a pro-life viewpoint often leads to wrinkled brows and sad sighs (or worse), in Dallas many of the "best people" are pro-life.

Frum, who worked with Miers in the early Bush years, opined in National Review Online: "Harriet Miers is a taut, nervous, anxious personality. It is hard for me to imagine that she can endure the anger and abuse -- or resist the blandishments -- that transformed, say, Anthony Kennedy into the judge he is today."