'Millennium Bomber' Sentence Tossed Out by U.S. Court
A federal appeals court Friday threw out the 22-year sentence imposed on Algerian Ahmed Ressam for plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport on the eve of the millennium.
The three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to U.S. District Court in Seattle to recalculate a sentence for his conviction on nine felony counts. It was the second time the appellate court has scrapped Ressam's sentence.
The San Francisco-based panel noted that the U.S. Supreme Court reversal of its first decision to vacate the term failed to take into consideration recent federal sentencing guidelines on what constitutes a reasonable sentence outside the preset range for criminal offenses.
Ressam was arrested Dec. 14, 1999, at a ferry terminal in Port Angeles, Wash., after crossing from British Columbia, Canada, in a rented sedan with explosives in the trunk. He had been under surveillance by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for at least two years for known association with suspected Al Qaeda operatives.
After leaving his native Algeria in 1994 for France and eventually Canada, Ressam was recruited by Al Qaeda and trained in Afghanistan in the building of bombs and the use of weapons.
He was one of four militants identified as part of the plot to set off explosions at public venues during the New Year's Eve celebrations ushering in 2000.
Ressam, now 41, cooperated with interrogators after his 2001 conviction, providing federal authorities with key information on other Al Qaeda operatives, including alleged co-conspirators held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Testimony provided by Ressam reportedly provided the U.S. government with evidence to prosecute alleged Al Qaeda kingpin Abu Zubaydah. The information was not extracted from him by "enhanced interrogation techniques" such as waterboarding, which is criticized by human rights advocates and others as torture.
His 22-year sentence, including a 10-year minimum applied for carrying explosives during the commission of a felony, was imposed by District Judge John C. Coughenour in 2005. It was the middle ground between the 35 years requested by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the 12 1/2 years proposed by Ressam's federal public defenders.
Both prosecutors and defense lawyers appealed, leading to the 9th Circuit's initial ruling in January 2007 that the sentence should be vacated and recalculated because the sentencing guidelines requiring the aggravating multiplier were too open-ended...
Read entire article at LAT
The three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals sent the case back to U.S. District Court in Seattle to recalculate a sentence for his conviction on nine felony counts. It was the second time the appellate court has scrapped Ressam's sentence.
The San Francisco-based panel noted that the U.S. Supreme Court reversal of its first decision to vacate the term failed to take into consideration recent federal sentencing guidelines on what constitutes a reasonable sentence outside the preset range for criminal offenses.
Ressam was arrested Dec. 14, 1999, at a ferry terminal in Port Angeles, Wash., after crossing from British Columbia, Canada, in a rented sedan with explosives in the trunk. He had been under surveillance by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for at least two years for known association with suspected Al Qaeda operatives.
After leaving his native Algeria in 1994 for France and eventually Canada, Ressam was recruited by Al Qaeda and trained in Afghanistan in the building of bombs and the use of weapons.
He was one of four militants identified as part of the plot to set off explosions at public venues during the New Year's Eve celebrations ushering in 2000.
Ressam, now 41, cooperated with interrogators after his 2001 conviction, providing federal authorities with key information on other Al Qaeda operatives, including alleged co-conspirators held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Testimony provided by Ressam reportedly provided the U.S. government with evidence to prosecute alleged Al Qaeda kingpin Abu Zubaydah. The information was not extracted from him by "enhanced interrogation techniques" such as waterboarding, which is criticized by human rights advocates and others as torture.
His 22-year sentence, including a 10-year minimum applied for carrying explosives during the commission of a felony, was imposed by District Judge John C. Coughenour in 2005. It was the middle ground between the 35 years requested by the U.S. Attorney's Office and the 12 1/2 years proposed by Ressam's federal public defenders.
Both prosecutors and defense lawyers appealed, leading to the 9th Circuit's initial ruling in January 2007 that the sentence should be vacated and recalculated because the sentencing guidelines requiring the aggravating multiplier were too open-ended...