"The object of war is not to die for your country but to make the other bastard die for his."

Of course, one might view this statement as, shall we say, somewhat evasive, given that it was made to men who, in substantial numbers, were about to be blown to smithereens, whether it was for something or for nothing.

Actually, it was a rhetorical question.

I don't know who first came up with the idea, but "Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori" is from Horace.

I don't know which politician came up with the idea of dying for one's country, but in the American case, I suppose the first to articulate that was a spy, Nathan Hale, captured by the British during the American Revolution, who supposedly said, just prior to his execution by hanging, "I regret that I have but one life to give for my country."

It is increasingly difficult to sustain that view when the country is lied into interminable occupations and wars abroad, that see us playing a role very much like that of the British in the American Revolution. They couldn't hold either Boston or Philadelphia, only New York City, and we are having difficulty controlling and occupying very much turf outside of either Baghdad or Kabul!