Big Brother and U: Is Your University Reading Your Email?
In a previous post, I discussed recent high-profile cases involving college surveillance and the use of email or Internet postings against students, faculty or staff. (Update: The Electronic Frontier Foundation effectively won its case defending the student leader who emailed her criticisms of Michigan State's calendar policy to faculty on campus. The university accused her of "spamming." FIRE referred the litigation to EFF, a civil liberties group specializing in electronic law).
In Part II, I offer the following information to shock you into how little privacy you have via e-mail or the Internet. In short, if you use a university email account--even off campus--the university owns that electronic "property" and may archive it for years....
For more, read
http://freesiu.blogspot.com/2009/01/big-brother-and-u-part-i-is-your.html
and
http://freesiu.blogspot.com/2009/01/big-brother-and-u-part-ii-is-your.html
In Part II, I offer the following information to shock you into how little privacy you have via e-mail or the Internet. In short, if you use a university email account--even off campus--the university owns that electronic "property" and may archive it for years....
For more, read
http://freesiu.blogspot.com/2009/01/big-brother-and-u-part-i-is-your.html
and
http://freesiu.blogspot.com/2009/01/big-brother-and-u-part-ii-is-your.html


Public or private?
After all, I assume you believe that privately owned nonprofits (like Georgetown University), just like privately owned for-profits (like Microsoft) should be able to set the rules governing employee use of their computers and email accounts.
Not a surprise
The key is having a good process in place that describes *who* can look at email and under what circumstances. No such policy will be perfect, but having one, especially one written with faculty input, is about the best you can do.