Return to Isolationism Strikes Again
Gentile Leaders Have Not Liked Jews
Truman's Latest Revealing Quote Part of an Historical Trend
by Mark Franklin
July 11, 2003
Many Jews are somewhat "shocked" to have recently discovered that President Truman did not care too much for them. In his diary that was recently released by the National Archives, he stated,
"The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as D[isplaced] P[ersons] as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the underdog."
Jews are quick to say that this was an isolated comment by President Truman, and that his comments do not accurately reflect his true feelings nor America's many elected and non-elected leaders throughout history. However, such an argument is contrary to reality. In fact, most Americans, including their leaders, have disliked Jews because of their mean and hateful nature; and this is part of a long and ongoing trend. Due to Gentile characteristics and Jewish political campaign support, however, Gentiles wink at their fellow Gentiles and often pretend to be nice to Jews. In reality, Gentiles have long voiced their opposition to Jews, whether openly or behind-the-scenes.
Indeed, the comments recently unearthed by President Truman were not the first such comments about Jews that were noted by him. Henry Wallace, the Secretary of Commerce under President Harry Truman, noted in his diary President Harry Truman's true feeling towards Jews. Truman, who Jews have often celebrated in America's past, apparently did not care too much for them, according to Wallace. Wallace noted:
"Truman was 'exasperated' over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist rule over Palestine. . . . Pres. Truman expressed himself as being very much 'put out' with the Jews. He said that 'Jesus Christ couldn't please them when he was on earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?' Pres. Truman said he had no use for them and didn't care what happened to them."
If Truman was the only President who was known to have said such comments, it might be simply ignored. But his comments were part of America's ongoing trend. President Dick Nixon once talked about the Jewish influence over American society. Nixon, a bit irritated with Jewish tactics at times and much like many other American Gentiles, often referred to Jews as "kikes" and "left-wing" Jews, which has been disclosed more recently in articles about him, much to the chagrin of Jews. When news stories were leaked, he noted--and rightly so--that it was often the fault of "our Jewish friends." When accusations that his Vice President took bribes were brought forth, he noted that the "Jewish crowd in Baltimore" were responsible for these accusations. He felt that the "Jewish cabal"--that is, those Jews who held appointments in the Bureau of Labor Statistics--were trying to make him look bad.(1) In one incident, he reportedly said something that is really disturbing to Jews:
"[T]here may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into consideration."(2)
At another time, Nixon Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman described such typical discussions behind-the-scenes in the White House:
"There was considerable discussion of the terrible problem arising from the total Jewish domination of the media, and agreement that this was something that would have to be dealt with."(3)
Just as Nixon honestly noticed with alarm that the Jews control the media, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff George S. Brown noticed this as well. This was some time back, of course. And things have gotten much worse since then. When Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff George S. Brown spoke to Duke University on October 10, 1975, he was asked a question by a student: "How can we stop Israel from obtaining from the Congress more foreign aid than any other nation in the world?" General Brown responded:
"When they get tough-minded enough to set down the Jewish influence in this country and break that lobby. It is so strong, you wouldn't believe it. Now, we have the Israelis coming to us for equipment. We say we can't probably get the Congress to support a program like this. And they say, 'Don't worry about the Congress. We will take care of the Congress.' This is somebody from another country. But they can do it. They own--you know--the banks in this country, the newspapers. Just look at where the Jewish money is."(4)
American Jewry demanded that Brown resign for telling the truth about their nefarious activities. Noticing this with deep concern, General M.B. Twining, a hero of WWII and the Korean War who was Commander of the U.S. Air Force, reportedly told the San Diego Union:
"A group of powerful U.S. Jews have grotesquely distorted U.S. foreign policy in blind fanatic support of Israel, and Gen. Brown deserves praise, not criticism, for saying so. As head of our nation's armed forces, he sees us--a nation of 200 million people--being dragooned into a disastrous war . . . by a ruthless lobby of Jewish-American extremists single-mindedly bent on enforcing their rule or ruin policy in the Middle East."(5)
The Generals were correct in their contention about the "Jewish-American extremists" who own the "newspapers" and a whole lot more. Even Jews such as Ben Stein have admitted to this openly in recent times. In fact, many Jews gloat about this fact, which is readily available on the Internet for those willing to take the time with a search engine. How did this come about--that Jews were able to take control of this country's leadership, as the generals accurately noted? It is interesting to take a look at the distant past and how this transition occurred.
At the time of the American Revolution, there were only about 1,000 Jews in all of America. This was because Gentiles were knowledgeable of the Jews' beliefs in colonial America and, for the most part, did not want Jews here. By 1790, Jews numbered only 1,350, while there were approximately 3.9 million Gentiles. And the number of Jews in the U.S. increased only to 2,700 by 1820. Whether it was due to a hostile Gentile climate, Jewish fears of savages, or Jewish thoughts of having to farm and physically work for their money, Jews did not markedly increase in population in the U.S. until the mid-1800s.
In any event, Jews such as Haym Salomon did try to curry the favor of Jefferson and Washington by giving them money. Other Jews, such as Mordecai Moses Noah, probably gave Jefferson and Washington good prices on the slaves they purchased, as Noah was a prominent slave trader, as were many of the early Jewish settlers.
While some Jews have claimed that Benjamin Franklin and George Washington were friends of the Jewish Race (and offered support and their names to help Jews build synagogues), it seems highly unlikely; and the sources of these Jews seem circumspect. For instance, Franklin has commented on a Jew, Neufville, in the past. Demonstrating that Franklin was aware of the Jewish cohesiveness even at this early date, he suggested that this Jew was "as much a Jew as any in Jerusalem." Franklin promulgated:
"It seems to me that it is principally with Mr. Neufville we have to do; and tho' I believe him to be as much a Jew as any in Jerusalem, I did not expect that with so many and such constant Professions of Friendship for the United States with which he loads all his Letters, he would have attempted to enforce his Demands (which I doubt not will be extravagant enough) by a Proceeding so abominable."(6)
The same can be said of John Quincy Adams, who was very much against Jewry. In 1780, he went to Amsterdam, Holland. While there, he went to a synagogue. In his diary, he noted his opinion of Jews there:
"[Jews] are all wretched creatures, for I think I never saw in my life such a set of miserable looking people. And they would steal your eyes out of your head if they could."(7)
Opinions such as Quincy's were the rule in colonial America, generally speaking, rather than the exception. While Thomas Jefferson's opinion of Jews seemed to echo that of John Quincy Adam's, it seems that Jefferson's feelings towards Jews were more based on solid reason than Adam's. Jefferson regarded the Jewish People as such:
"Jews. Their system was Deism; that is, the belief in one only God. But their ideas of him and attributes were degrading and injurious. Their ethics were not only imperfect, but often irreconcilable with the sound dictates of reason and morality, as they respect intercourse with those around us; and repulsive and anti-social, as respecting other nations. They need reformation, therefore, in an eminent degree."(8)
When discussing the ethics of Jews, Jefferson felt that the Jews were severely lacking. Although there were instances of Jefferson paying respect to individual Jews, there was no indication that he wanted more of their kind in the U.S. Jefferson often gave "word" to Jewish rights, much like he did to the emancipation of slaves (only a handful of his 100-plus slaves were freed upon his death, despite his remarks against slavery). Still, he glowingly approved and cited William Enfield's findings to John Quincy Adams, noted in the epitome of Johann Jakob Brucker's Historia critica philosophae:
"Ethics were so little studied among the Jews, that in their whole compilation called the Talmud, there is only one treatise on moral subjects. Their books of Morals chiefly consisted in a minute enumeration of duties. From the law of Moses were deduced 613 precepts, which were divided into two classes, affirmative and negative, 248 in the former, and 365 in the latter. It may serve to give the reader some idea of the low state of moral philosophy among the Jews in the Middle Age, to add, that of the 248 affirmative precepts, only 3 were considered as obligatory upon women; and that in order to obtain salvation, it was judged sufficient to fulfill any one single law in the hour of death; the observance of the rest being deemed necessary, only to increase the felicity of the future life. What a wretched depravity of sentiment and manners must have prevailed before such corrupt maxims could have obtained credit! It is impossible to collect from these writings a consistent series of moral Doctrine."(9)
Peter Stuyvesant, the Governor of New Amsterdam, expelled Jews from his colony. He did this because he was knowledgeable of the Jewish Oral Laws and sought to prevent them from gaining a foothold in America, which would eventually lead to conflict and problems. He wrote a letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company on September 22, 1654, telling his reason. (However, the Jews whom he banished contacted their fellow Jews in Holland, who demanded that those Jews be allowed to stay. The company said that the Jews should not be expelled because they were "poor" and "persecuted," and also because the Jews who Stuyvesant sought to banish had "a large amount of capital which they have invested in shares of this company.") In his letter, Stuyvesant wrote:
"The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak and newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves as also for the general community of your worships, that the deceitful race . . . not to be allowed to infect and trouble this new colony."(10)
During colonial times, Jews were often not allowed to vote or to hold any type of public office. For instance, in New Netherland, as Leonard Dinnerstein notes in his book Anti-Semitism in America, Jews "were refused by law permission to worship in public, vote, hold office, purchase land, work as craftsmen, engage in retail operations, or trade with Indians." Also, they were not allowed to practice law. France's minister to the U.S. commented that, in 1786, anti-Jewish feelings "are still too strong to enable Jews to enjoy the privileges accorded to all their citizens." Indeed, while Jews petitioned Maryland in 1797 to be allowed to vote, practice law, and hold office, it was not for nearly three decades--1826--that Maryland passed what was deemed as the "Jew Bill," due to its strong opposition. And, Jews were not allowed to vote in North Carolina until 1868, while New Hampshire did not allow Jews that until 1877--several years after the 15th Amendment gave them that "right."(11)
From an ethical standpoint, there can be no justification for any religious Jew being given a Law License. The Jews' Oral Laws--that is, those contained in their Talmud--state that "the best of Gentiles deserves to be killed." This is not an exaggeration either, as I have seen this in an English version of the Talmud. It also says that it is OK for them to cheat Gentiles; that land owned by Gentiles is like "unclaimed land in the desert" (hence, the situation in Israel where non-Jews cannot obtain building permits or own--or even lease--land); and all sorts of other unethical ideals. Yet no consideration is given for these Jews not to practice law, which certainly lies contrary to the ethics required of attorneys.
But back to the distant past: Anti-Jewish sentiment was clearly prevalent among Gentile colonists. While much of it was religious in nature, some of it was for the other reasons why Jews are generally disliked throughout the civilized world today: usury, cheating, lying, stealing, murdering, debauchery-producing, revolution-inciting, decadence-promoting, et cetera, ad nauseam. (You can do a search with http://www.google.com for the online English translation of a book called "The Jew as Criminal," which presents some interesting findings from pre-WWII Germany, which details criminal statistics.) The Niles' Register, a large early American newspaper, noted that Jews were "everywhere despised and maltreated." Instilling anti-Jewish values was common among Gentiles. In one children's book, for example, it had a character who said, "I have heard that hatred of Jews has been a reckoned a virtue." Also, a Mother Goose rhyme promoted similar thoughts:
Jack Sold His Egg
To a Rogue of a Jew
Who Cheated Him Out
Of Half His Due.(12)
In the 1870s, some resorts and nice hotels refused Jews entrance. Some neighborhoods refused Jews to move there by "gentlemen's agreements." Many private clubs did not permit Jews to join.
Numerous prestigious universities denied Jews entrance. Administrator of Harvard Increase Mather and his successor, Samuel Willard, both denounced Jews in colonial America. Later, Lawrence Lowell, president of Harvard, said he felt that Harvard had a "Jewish problem" in 1922, because he felt there was a disproportionate number of Jews.(13) (Unfortunately, today, since America has allowed Jews to teach at Harvard, Jews have worked in a cohesive manner to essentially "steal" the university. It is now filled with such Jewish pseudo-scholars as Noel Ignatiev, who openly seeks to destroy Gentile civilization.)
In the past, things were much different. In 1855, William W. Stowe, the speaker of the House of Representatives, proposed charging Jews a high tax to keep them out of the state of California. They weren't. Now, look at California.
During the Civil War, General Ulysses S. Grant noticed with alarm that Jews, despite their small number in the general population, were engaged in a disproportionate amount of illegal trade. Reportedly, he felt that they were engaged in smuggling, theft, speculation, vagrancy, and a host of other crimes, including possible treason. Most noticeably, he felt that Jews were the carpetbaggers, who were despised in the South. In a letter to C.P. Wolcott, Assistant Secretary of War, on December 17, 1862, Grant wrote:
"I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the specie regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by the Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officer at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department. But they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at a military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy at an agreed rate, paying gold."
Also, on December 17, 1862, General Ulysses S. Grant issued General Orders No. 11. This order banished all Jews from Tennessee's western military district. General Orders No. 11 declared:
"1. The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, are hereby expelled from the Department.
"2. Within 24 hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.
"3. No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.
"By order of Major Gen. Grant.
"Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant General"
Abraham Lincoln rescinded General Orders No. 11. However, Henry W. Halleck, the General-in-Chief of the Army, told Grant that "the President has no objection to you expelling traitors and Jew peddlers."(14)
Perhaps, this comment later led, in part, to Lincoln's assassination by John Wilkes Booth, an advocate of slavery. (Some have alleged that Booth was also Jewish, and that his real last name was Botha, though I have not been able to verify that for certain.) Booth was a friend of Simon Wolf--an attorney for the Jewish secret society B'nai B'rith. (B'nai B'rith is the parent organization of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League--ADL--founded after B'nai B'rith Atlanta chapter head Leo Frank murdered the 12-year-old Gentile girl Mary Phagan.) Simon Wolf was often involved in theatrical productions. Reportedly, Esther L. Panitz briefly notes in her authorized biography of B'nai B'rith's Simon Wolf that he had a sense of familiarity with Booth. Panitz describes this little-known relationship between Wolf and Booth:
"Locally, the group's theatrical productions received good press. Wolf, who would often play the Ghost in Hamlet or Shylock in the Merchant of Venice, bore an uncanny resemblance to John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln's assassin. Earlier in Cleveland, Booth had Wolf and Peixotto in dramatic performances. Years afterward, Wolf remembered that he had met Booth once again in the Willard Hotel, on the morning of the day Lincoln was shot. . . . Wolf also recalled that once he sat for a picture entitled 'The Assassination of President Lincoln.'"
Also, in Wolf's book Presidents I Have Known, Wolf reportedly acknowledged that he had met with Booth at the Willard Hotel on the fateful day that Lincoln was assassinated. Apparently, they even had a few drinks together. Strange bedfellows.
Wolf probably had bitter feelings towards Lincoln, especially to watch a play entitled "The Assassination of President Lincoln" about Lincoln's death. This may have been because of the past difficulties Wolf had with Lincoln's subordinates. For instance, Wolf was arrested by LaFayette C. Baker, the chief of detectives in Washington, D.C., for being part of a "conspiratorial organization" that was allegedly involved in "spying and blockade running on behalf of the Confederacy." (Later, LaFayette was promoted to the position of head of the U.S. Secret Service.) Both General Grant and Baker reportedly looked at the B'nai B'rith as a "spy agency."(15) Perhaps, Wolf was involved in such activities because of Lincoln putting an end to slavery; or perhaps Wolf did it because Judah P. Benjamin in the South was a member of the Jewish Race, though a proselyte-Christian, and, consequently, Wolf felt more secure with the South. Some have suggested that Lincoln was despised by Jewish aristocrats because he produced "greenbacks," thereby making international financiers purposeless. It is difficult to speculate why, whatever the case.
If Grant was alone in his recognition of Jews being involved in traitorous activities and unscrupulous trade, his findings could be perhaps written off as mere fanaticism. However, he was not. And there was more than just LaFayette Baker. As noted in The Sherman Letters, Gen. William Sherman also said similar things when he was in Union-occupied Memphis, Tennessee, on July 30, 1862:
"I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have but one use--the purchase of arms and ammunition. . . . Of course, I have respected all permits by yourself of the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews), I have stopped it."
There has been some speculation that Lincoln was assassinated as a result of Jewish hatred. If that was the case, he was not the last.
Huey Long, a pro-Gentile presidential candidate in the 1920s who had a good chance of being elected, was assassinated by the Jewish dentist Carl Weiss. It almost seems as if assassinations in America are part of a trend among Jews.
With regards to Kennedy's assassination, there was that strip club owner Jack Ruby who somehow was able to get close enough to shoot Lee Harvey Oswald. Oswald, who had once gave up his American citizenship and ran off to the Soviet Union at the height of Jewish Communism, was held in custody for killing Kennedy; and while being taken somewhere, Ruby comes out of nowhere with a loaded pistol and puts a bullet in Oswald--shortly after he had agreed to tell all. This shows there is much more to this issue than we know. Why would a strip club owner, not the typical person who seems like he would care too much, take this upon himself? How did Ruby know that Oswald would be coming out at that time and that entrance? How was Ruby able to get by security with a loaded gun? How was he able to get close enough to Oswald to shoot him at point-blank range? These are all good questions that need to be answered.(16) I don't think Kennedy cared too much for Israel's terrorist activities, and that might have made some Jews unhappy.
But, if Jews made Kennedy unhappy, he was hardly the first. Jews have been kicked out of nearly every civilization in the entire world. These are a few of the areas in which Jews have been expelled, noted as the areas they are known as today and followed by the year of the expulsion(s):
Africa (1147, 1790), Arabia (624), Austria (1298), Babylon (586BC), Bavaria (1551), Belgium (1370), Czechoslovokia (1745), Denmark (not allowed in until the 17th century), Egypt (1571BC, 38BC, 3BC, 66), England (not allowed in until the 12th century, expelled in 1290), France (561, 1182, 1242, 1306, 1394, 1540, 1682), Germany (1012, 1096, 1146, 1298, 1510, 1614, 1935-revoked citizenship), Hungary (1360, 1582, 1717), Italy (1492, 1540, 1550, 1846), Iraq (not allowed to emigrate to until 2003), Lebanon (Jews not allowed entrance), Palestine (70, 324), Lithuania (1495), Netherlands (1444), Norway (1814), Poland (1453, 1772-Pale of Settlement), Portugal (1498), Prussia (1510), Rome (315, 379), Russia (1772-Pale of Settlement, 1881), Saxony (1349), Slovakia (1380, 1744), Spain (612, 694, 1391, 1492-1968, officially), Sweden (until 1782), Switzerland (1939), Syria (Jews not allowed entrance).
Hence, we see that these "underground" feelings that are prevalent among Gentiles are not even isolated to America; they accurately reflect the entire world's feelings towards Jews throughout history. The reason for this is that Jews are generally "mean," for lack of a better all-inclusive term that adequately summarizes Jewish characteristics, though Jews are basically incapable of introspection and fail to recognize this inherent trait among them. Indeed, looking at WWII, it would not have even been caused if not for Jews. Jews had taken over Russia and had murdered 60 million Russians. Jews then tried to do the same with Germany, but failed miserably (at first). Today, about 60 years after the fact, they continuously feed the world pity-the-Jew-propaganda on a daily basis.
Many respectable Americans felt that Jews had indeed caused WWII (just as today many feel that they are at fault for the Iraq War). Joseph P. Kennedy, the father of America's Kennedy dynasty, who was a U.S. Ambassador in London prior to WWII, stated why England went to war:
"[British Prime Minister] Chamberlain stated that America and the world's Jews had forced England into the war."(17)
Indeed, during WWII, most Americans could have cared less for Jews. Hugh Wilson, the US Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany "understandable." This was because before the advent of the National Socialists there, "the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews...among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews ... the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred."(18)
World War II hero General George Patton reflected many of America's leaders views of Jews. He described Jewish Displaced Persons as being "without any of the cultural or social refinements of our time." He found that many lacked morals common among others. "My opinion is that no people," said Gen. Patton, "could have sunk to the level of degradation these people have reached in the short space of four years."(19) Writing of the "Semitic revenge [planned by Morgenthau and Baruch] against all Germans," Gen. Patton promulgated:
"Harrison and his ilk believe that the displaced person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals."(20)
General Patton was hardly alone in those feelings. General MacArthur also felt similarly. Likewise, George Van Horn Moseley did too. George Van Horn Moseley was both a General of the United States and Deputy Secretary of State.
At one time, he had been asked to join the America First Committee (AFC). The following letter, which is Moseley's response to join the AFC, is reprinted in the book The 'Jewish Threat': Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army by Jewish author Joseph Bendersky. Similar to many others who are in or have been in the government, former General and Deputy Secretary of State George Van Horn Moseley was also concerned about Jewish influence. His voice still needs to be heard, and perhaps his lifting idea, which he wrote in all caps below, needs to be considered today. Differing from many others in this aspect, however, he was outspoken about his beliefs, not being a politician nor one to hide. His letter follows:
Atlanta, Georgia
October 23, 1940
Mr. R. Douglas Stuart, Jr., Director
America First Committee,
1806 Board of Trade Building,
Chicago, Illinois
Dear Mr. Stuart:
If I am to acknowledge the receipt of your letter dated October 11th, I must, in keeping with the principles which have always governed me, write you very frankly.
At the outset, I must say that I am happy to know that your organization has chosen such a vital mission. But I wonder if you realize the difficulties of such a campaign and the real strength of the enemy-and are you prepared to go to battle with him and with his tribe? A number of organizations have stared out bravely with a mission similar to yours, but too often they have melted away before the enemy.
I have had considerable experience on this subject, for I tried to arouse the American people from their apathy, pointing out the dangers confronting us as a nation. But I stated the truth too frankly and so, for many months now, my pen and my voice have been silenced.
Early in my endeavors, I received an invitation to speak before the Union League Club of Chicago, an organization I remember from boyhood, which always marched in step with the Republic. No date had been fixed but when the enemy went after me in the public press the heroic Union League Club evidently lost their nerve, and they did not renew their invitation.
What prevents America from being first today? Let me be frank and point out the enemy who would themselves be first in America today, and that is the Jewish nation, a nation within a nation. If you will investigate, as I have - crime, graft, filthy publications and unsavory movies, the liquor and drug traffic, the red light district, white slave traffic, and WAR - you will arrive head on against a pack of Jews in control.
I am not going to take your time to discuss in this letter the age old problem of the Jew, but if you are interested, you can get all the evidence concerning his plans for world domination from the writings of Jews, themselves. You do not have to rely on the statement of any Gentile. Suffice it to say, however, that they have been driven out of every country in which they have been domiciled, and for good reason, and EVENTUALLY THEY WILL BE DRIVEN OUT OF THE U.S.A. [Moseley's emphasis]
The Jew may tell you that there are only some four and a half million of them in the United States. The fact is there are over thirteen million of them in the United States today. Formerly I felt sorry for the Member of Congress who could not face this problem frankly on account of Jewish influence in his district, but now I find the influence of the Jew extends to every field. The banker, who may agree with me on principle just one hundred percent, dares not touch this problem, for some of his biggest depositors are Jews; many a lawyer will not face it for some of his big clients are Jews; the press cannot touch it, for so many of the big advertisers are Jews, and it is the advertiser who makes the paper pay. If we lack the character to face this problem squarely and solve it, we will experience the tragedy which overtook France.
I shall be glad to join your organization, assisting it as far as I am permitted to do so -
1. If you eliminate from your organization all Jews and all Jewish influences (they join all organizations and buy in or on both political parties; thus they keep themselves fully advised, and control or ruin);
2. If you will come out before the nation with a definite statement against the Jew and all he stands for, including the closing of our doors to all refugee Jews, of whatever nationality;
3. If you will take a definite stand against the control by Jews in local, state and national affairs;
4. If you will advocate the restoration of our REPUBLIC [Moseley's emphasis], bringing back the in the written and spoken language throughout the United States the words, "Republic, Christ and Christian".
If you will take the stand that I have suggested above, millions of Gentiles will rush to your banner. But if you fail to meet this issue squarely, your organization will accomplish nothing, except possibly to support a certain overhead, including perhaps several Jewish secretaries, placed with you for the purpose of spying upon you and your work.
You may not agree with me in what I have written above. Perhaps you will give this letter no consideration whatsoever, but may I ask you to preserve it, so that as the years roll by you may again read it, with the perspective of, say, ten to fifteen years. May I ask also that you make acknowledgement of it, for I plan to give copies of this letter to individuals over the land who know this problem and agree with me just one hundred percent.
Enclosed herewith is a copy of a letter inviting me to meet Mr. Lewis L. Strauss of Kuhn, Loeb & Company, and my reply.
Very sincerely yours,
George Van Horn Moseley
It has been many years since Moseley's comments. Since that time, Jews have gained nearly full control of America's government. Such power is clearly illustrated by former Illinois Congressman of 20 years Paul Findley's book They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby. He tells about how Jewish plutocrats strongly influence America's policies, particularly with respect to Israel and the Mid-East. But this control is over much more than America's foreign policy with respect to Israel. Indeed, America has just gotten out of the Iraq War, which was caused due to Jewish influence.
Shall we allow America to continue to be taken by the hands of Jews, letting Jews lead America down the pathway towards apocalypse. Or shall we put an end to this control, and proclaim from the highest pulpit,
"Free at last! Thank God Almighty, Gentiles are free at last!"
____________________________________
NOTES:
1. Dinnerstein, Leonard, Anti-Semitism in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).
2.) Dinnerstein, pp. 232-233.
3.) "The Haldeman Diaries" (N.Y.: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1994), p. 405.
4.) "The Generals and the Jews," Newsweek (November 25, 1974), p. 39.
5.) Also, see The 'Jewish Threat': Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army by Jewish author Joseph Bendersky (New York: Basic Books, 2000), pp. 428-429, for more about this particular controversy.
6.) The Writings of Benjamin Franklin, Vol. 8, The MacMillian Co., p. 332.
7.) Dinnerstein, p. 11; citing Diary of John Quincy Adams (Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1981), I, p. 59.
8.) Gerber, David, Anti-Semitism in American History (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1986), p. 59.
9.) Gerber, p. 59.
10.) Dinnerstein, p. 5; Letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company from New Amsterdam, September 22, 1654; Harry Golden and Martin Rywell, The Jews in American History.
11.) Dinnerstein, pp. 5, 7, 11, 15, 17.
12.) Dinnerstein, p. 17, 18, 19.
13.) Dinnerstein, p. 8, 84.
14). Dinnerstein, p. 32.
15.) EIR, The Ugly Truth about the ADL (Washington, D.C.: Executive Intelligence Review, 1994), pp. 8-9.
16.) The fact that Ruby was able to get close enough to Oswald after he murdered President Kennedy--and Ruby knew where Oswald would be at a particular time--while carrying a loaded weapon speaks great deals in and of itself. There is a book written by Michael Piper, who works at the American Free Press, that mentions possible Jewish involvement in Kennedy's assassination, I am told, though I have not personally read it yet.
17.) The Forrestal Diaries, ed. Millis, Cassell, 1952, p. 129.
18.) Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars (Longmans, 1941), quoted by Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh (Hodder, 1976), p. 252.
19.) Bendersky, Joseph, The 'Jewish Threat': Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army (New York: Perseus Books, 2000), pp. 352-357
20.) Bendersky, p. 357
Truman's Latest Revealing Quote Part of an Historical Trend
by Mark Franklin
July 11, 2003
Many Jews are somewhat "shocked" to have recently discovered that President Truman did not care too much for them. In his diary that was recently released by the National Archives, he stated,
"The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as D[isplaced] P[ersons] as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the underdog."
Jews are quick to say that this was an isolated comment by President Truman, and that his comments do not accurately reflect his true feelings nor America's many elected and non-elected leaders throughout history. However, such an argument is contrary to reality. In fact, most Americans, including their leaders, have disliked Jews because of their mean and hateful nature; and this is part of a long and ongoing trend. Due to Gentile characteristics and Jewish political campaign support, however, Gentiles wink at their fellow Gentiles and often pretend to be nice to Jews. In reality, Gentiles have long voiced their opposition to Jews, whether openly or behind-the-scenes.
Indeed, the comments recently unearthed by President Truman were not the first such comments about Jews that were noted by him. Henry Wallace, the Secretary of Commerce under President Harry Truman, noted in his diary President Harry Truman's true feeling towards Jews. Truman, who Jews have often celebrated in America's past, apparently did not care too much for them, according to Wallace. Wallace noted:
"Truman was 'exasperated' over Jewish pressure that he support Zionist rule over Palestine. . . . Pres. Truman expressed himself as being very much 'put out' with the Jews. He said that 'Jesus Christ couldn't please them when he was on earth, so how could anyone expect that I would have any luck?' Pres. Truman said he had no use for them and didn't care what happened to them."
If Truman was the only President who was known to have said such comments, it might be simply ignored. But his comments were part of America's ongoing trend. President Dick Nixon once talked about the Jewish influence over American society. Nixon, a bit irritated with Jewish tactics at times and much like many other American Gentiles, often referred to Jews as "kikes" and "left-wing" Jews, which has been disclosed more recently in articles about him, much to the chagrin of Jews. When news stories were leaked, he noted--and rightly so--that it was often the fault of "our Jewish friends." When accusations that his Vice President took bribes were brought forth, he noted that the "Jewish crowd in Baltimore" were responsible for these accusations. He felt that the "Jewish cabal"--that is, those Jews who held appointments in the Bureau of Labor Statistics--were trying to make him look bad.(1) In one incident, he reportedly said something that is really disturbing to Jews:
"[T]here may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into consideration."(2)
At another time, Nixon Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman described such typical discussions behind-the-scenes in the White House:
"There was considerable discussion of the terrible problem arising from the total Jewish domination of the media, and agreement that this was something that would have to be dealt with."(3)
Just as Nixon honestly noticed with alarm that the Jews control the media, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff George S. Brown noticed this as well. This was some time back, of course. And things have gotten much worse since then. When Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff George S. Brown spoke to Duke University on October 10, 1975, he was asked a question by a student: "How can we stop Israel from obtaining from the Congress more foreign aid than any other nation in the world?" General Brown responded:
"When they get tough-minded enough to set down the Jewish influence in this country and break that lobby. It is so strong, you wouldn't believe it. Now, we have the Israelis coming to us for equipment. We say we can't probably get the Congress to support a program like this. And they say, 'Don't worry about the Congress. We will take care of the Congress.' This is somebody from another country. But they can do it. They own--you know--the banks in this country, the newspapers. Just look at where the Jewish money is."(4)
American Jewry demanded that Brown resign for telling the truth about their nefarious activities. Noticing this with deep concern, General M.B. Twining, a hero of WWII and the Korean War who was Commander of the U.S. Air Force, reportedly told the San Diego Union:
"A group of powerful U.S. Jews have grotesquely distorted U.S. foreign policy in blind fanatic support of Israel, and Gen. Brown deserves praise, not criticism, for saying so. As head of our nation's armed forces, he sees us--a nation of 200 million people--being dragooned into a disastrous war . . . by a ruthless lobby of Jewish-American extremists single-mindedly bent on enforcing their rule or ruin policy in the Middle East."(5)
The Generals were correct in their contention about the "Jewish-American extremists" who own the "newspapers" and a whole lot more. Even Jews such as Ben Stein have admitted to this openly in recent times. In fact, many Jews gloat about this fact, which is readily available on the Internet for those willing to take the time with a search engine. How did this come about--that Jews were able to take control of this country's leadership, as the generals accurately noted? It is interesting to take a look at the distant past and how this transition occurred.
At the time of the American Revolution, there were only about 1,000 Jews in all of America. This was because Gentiles were knowledgeable of the Jews' beliefs in colonial America and, for the most part, did not want Jews here. By 1790, Jews numbered only 1,350, while there were approximately 3.9 million Gentiles. And the number of Jews in the U.S. increased only to 2,700 by 1820. Whether it was due to a hostile Gentile climate, Jewish fears of savages, or Jewish thoughts of having to farm and physically work for their money, Jews did not markedly increase in population in the U.S. until the mid-1800s.
In any event, Jews such as Haym Salomon did try to curry the favor of Jefferson and Washington by giving them money. Other Jews, such as Mordecai Moses Noah, probably gave Jefferson and Washington good prices on the slaves they purchased, as Noah was a prominent slave trader, as were many of the early Jewish settlers.
While some Jews have claimed that Benjamin Franklin and George Washington were friends of the Jewish Race (and offered support and their names to help Jews build synagogues), it seems highly unlikely; and the sources of these Jews seem circumspect. For instance, Franklin has commented on a Jew, Neufville, in the past. Demonstrating that Franklin was aware of the Jewish cohesiveness even at this early date, he suggested that this Jew was "as much a Jew as any in Jerusalem." Franklin promulgated:
"It seems to me that it is principally with Mr. Neufville we have to do; and tho' I believe him to be as much a Jew as any in Jerusalem, I did not expect that with so many and such constant Professions of Friendship for the United States with which he loads all his Letters, he would have attempted to enforce his Demands (which I doubt not will be extravagant enough) by a Proceeding so abominable."(6)
The same can be said of John Quincy Adams, who was very much against Jewry. In 1780, he went to Amsterdam, Holland. While there, he went to a synagogue. In his diary, he noted his opinion of Jews there:
"[Jews] are all wretched creatures, for I think I never saw in my life such a set of miserable looking people. And they would steal your eyes out of your head if they could."(7)
Opinions such as Quincy's were the rule in colonial America, generally speaking, rather than the exception. While Thomas Jefferson's opinion of Jews seemed to echo that of John Quincy Adam's, it seems that Jefferson's feelings towards Jews were more based on solid reason than Adam's. Jefferson regarded the Jewish People as such:
"Jews. Their system was Deism; that is, the belief in one only God. But their ideas of him and attributes were degrading and injurious. Their ethics were not only imperfect, but often irreconcilable with the sound dictates of reason and morality, as they respect intercourse with those around us; and repulsive and anti-social, as respecting other nations. They need reformation, therefore, in an eminent degree."(8)
When discussing the ethics of Jews, Jefferson felt that the Jews were severely lacking. Although there were instances of Jefferson paying respect to individual Jews, there was no indication that he wanted more of their kind in the U.S. Jefferson often gave "word" to Jewish rights, much like he did to the emancipation of slaves (only a handful of his 100-plus slaves were freed upon his death, despite his remarks against slavery). Still, he glowingly approved and cited William Enfield's findings to John Quincy Adams, noted in the epitome of Johann Jakob Brucker's Historia critica philosophae:
"Ethics were so little studied among the Jews, that in their whole compilation called the Talmud, there is only one treatise on moral subjects. Their books of Morals chiefly consisted in a minute enumeration of duties. From the law of Moses were deduced 613 precepts, which were divided into two classes, affirmative and negative, 248 in the former, and 365 in the latter. It may serve to give the reader some idea of the low state of moral philosophy among the Jews in the Middle Age, to add, that of the 248 affirmative precepts, only 3 were considered as obligatory upon women; and that in order to obtain salvation, it was judged sufficient to fulfill any one single law in the hour of death; the observance of the rest being deemed necessary, only to increase the felicity of the future life. What a wretched depravity of sentiment and manners must have prevailed before such corrupt maxims could have obtained credit! It is impossible to collect from these writings a consistent series of moral Doctrine."(9)
Peter Stuyvesant, the Governor of New Amsterdam, expelled Jews from his colony. He did this because he was knowledgeable of the Jewish Oral Laws and sought to prevent them from gaining a foothold in America, which would eventually lead to conflict and problems. He wrote a letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company on September 22, 1654, telling his reason. (However, the Jews whom he banished contacted their fellow Jews in Holland, who demanded that those Jews be allowed to stay. The company said that the Jews should not be expelled because they were "poor" and "persecuted," and also because the Jews who Stuyvesant sought to banish had "a large amount of capital which they have invested in shares of this company.") In his letter, Stuyvesant wrote:
"The Jews who have arrived would nearly all like to remain here, but learning that they (with their customary usury and deceitful trading with Christians) were very repugnant to the inferior magistrates, as also to the people having the most affection for you; the Deaconry also fearing that owing to their present indigence they might become a charge in the coming winter, we have, for the benefit of this weak and newly developing place and land in general, deemed it useful to require them in a friendly way to depart; praying also most seriously in this connection, for ourselves as also for the general community of your worships, that the deceitful race . . . not to be allowed to infect and trouble this new colony."(10)
During colonial times, Jews were often not allowed to vote or to hold any type of public office. For instance, in New Netherland, as Leonard Dinnerstein notes in his book Anti-Semitism in America, Jews "were refused by law permission to worship in public, vote, hold office, purchase land, work as craftsmen, engage in retail operations, or trade with Indians." Also, they were not allowed to practice law. France's minister to the U.S. commented that, in 1786, anti-Jewish feelings "are still too strong to enable Jews to enjoy the privileges accorded to all their citizens." Indeed, while Jews petitioned Maryland in 1797 to be allowed to vote, practice law, and hold office, it was not for nearly three decades--1826--that Maryland passed what was deemed as the "Jew Bill," due to its strong opposition. And, Jews were not allowed to vote in North Carolina until 1868, while New Hampshire did not allow Jews that until 1877--several years after the 15th Amendment gave them that "right."(11)
From an ethical standpoint, there can be no justification for any religious Jew being given a Law License. The Jews' Oral Laws--that is, those contained in their Talmud--state that "the best of Gentiles deserves to be killed." This is not an exaggeration either, as I have seen this in an English version of the Talmud. It also says that it is OK for them to cheat Gentiles; that land owned by Gentiles is like "unclaimed land in the desert" (hence, the situation in Israel where non-Jews cannot obtain building permits or own--or even lease--land); and all sorts of other unethical ideals. Yet no consideration is given for these Jews not to practice law, which certainly lies contrary to the ethics required of attorneys.
But back to the distant past: Anti-Jewish sentiment was clearly prevalent among Gentile colonists. While much of it was religious in nature, some of it was for the other reasons why Jews are generally disliked throughout the civilized world today: usury, cheating, lying, stealing, murdering, debauchery-producing, revolution-inciting, decadence-promoting, et cetera, ad nauseam. (You can do a search with http://www.google.com for the online English translation of a book called "The Jew as Criminal," which presents some interesting findings from pre-WWII Germany, which details criminal statistics.) The Niles' Register, a large early American newspaper, noted that Jews were "everywhere despised and maltreated." Instilling anti-Jewish values was common among Gentiles. In one children's book, for example, it had a character who said, "I have heard that hatred of Jews has been a reckoned a virtue." Also, a Mother Goose rhyme promoted similar thoughts:
Jack Sold His Egg
To a Rogue of a Jew
Who Cheated Him Out
Of Half His Due.(12)
In the 1870s, some resorts and nice hotels refused Jews entrance. Some neighborhoods refused Jews to move there by "gentlemen's agreements." Many private clubs did not permit Jews to join.
Numerous prestigious universities denied Jews entrance. Administrator of Harvard Increase Mather and his successor, Samuel Willard, both denounced Jews in colonial America. Later, Lawrence Lowell, president of Harvard, said he felt that Harvard had a "Jewish problem" in 1922, because he felt there was a disproportionate number of Jews.(13) (Unfortunately, today, since America has allowed Jews to teach at Harvard, Jews have worked in a cohesive manner to essentially "steal" the university. It is now filled with such Jewish pseudo-scholars as Noel Ignatiev, who openly seeks to destroy Gentile civilization.)
In the past, things were much different. In 1855, William W. Stowe, the speaker of the House of Representatives, proposed charging Jews a high tax to keep them out of the state of California. They weren't. Now, look at California.
During the Civil War, General Ulysses S. Grant noticed with alarm that Jews, despite their small number in the general population, were engaged in a disproportionate amount of illegal trade. Reportedly, he felt that they were engaged in smuggling, theft, speculation, vagrancy, and a host of other crimes, including possible treason. Most noticeably, he felt that Jews were the carpetbaggers, who were despised in the South. In a letter to C.P. Wolcott, Assistant Secretary of War, on December 17, 1862, Grant wrote:
"I have long since believed that in spite of all the vigilance that can be infused into post commanders, the specie regulations of the Treasury Department have been violated, and that mostly by the Jews and other unprincipled traders. So well satisfied have I been of this that I instructed the commanding officer at Columbus to refuse all permits to Jews to come South, and I have frequently had them expelled from the department. But they come in with their carpet-sacks in spite of all that can be done to prevent it. The Jews seem to be a privileged class that can travel anywhere. They will land at any woodyard on the river and make their way through the country. If not permitted to buy cotton themselves, they will act as agents for someone else, who will be at a military post with a Treasury permit to receive cotton and pay for it in Treasury notes which the Jew will buy at an agreed rate, paying gold."
Also, on December 17, 1862, General Ulysses S. Grant issued General Orders No. 11. This order banished all Jews from Tennessee's western military district. General Orders No. 11 declared:
"1. The Jews, as a class, violating every regulation of trade established by the Treasury Department, are hereby expelled from the Department.
"2. Within 24 hours from the receipt of this order by Post Commanders, they will see that all of this class of people are furnished with passes required to leave, and anyone returning after such notification, will be arrested and held in confinement until an opportunity occurs of sending them out as prisoners, unless furnished with permits from these headquarters.
"3. No permits will be given these people to visit headquarters for the purpose of making personal application for trade permits.
"By order of Major Gen. Grant.
"Jno. A. Rawlings, Assistant Adjutant General"
Abraham Lincoln rescinded General Orders No. 11. However, Henry W. Halleck, the General-in-Chief of the Army, told Grant that "the President has no objection to you expelling traitors and Jew peddlers."(14)
Perhaps, this comment later led, in part, to Lincoln's assassination by John Wilkes Booth, an advocate of slavery. (Some have alleged that Booth was also Jewish, and that his real last name was Botha, though I have not been able to verify that for certain.) Booth was a friend of Simon Wolf--an attorney for the Jewish secret society B'nai B'rith. (B'nai B'rith is the parent organization of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League--ADL--founded after B'nai B'rith Atlanta chapter head Leo Frank murdered the 12-year-old Gentile girl Mary Phagan.) Simon Wolf was often involved in theatrical productions. Reportedly, Esther L. Panitz briefly notes in her authorized biography of B'nai B'rith's Simon Wolf that he had a sense of familiarity with Booth. Panitz describes this little-known relationship between Wolf and Booth:
"Locally, the group's theatrical productions received good press. Wolf, who would often play the Ghost in Hamlet or Shylock in the Merchant of Venice, bore an uncanny resemblance to John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln's assassin. Earlier in Cleveland, Booth had Wolf and Peixotto in dramatic performances. Years afterward, Wolf remembered that he had met Booth once again in the Willard Hotel, on the morning of the day Lincoln was shot. . . . Wolf also recalled that once he sat for a picture entitled 'The Assassination of President Lincoln.'"
Also, in Wolf's book Presidents I Have Known, Wolf reportedly acknowledged that he had met with Booth at the Willard Hotel on the fateful day that Lincoln was assassinated. Apparently, they even had a few drinks together. Strange bedfellows.
Wolf probably had bitter feelings towards Lincoln, especially to watch a play entitled "The Assassination of President Lincoln" about Lincoln's death. This may have been because of the past difficulties Wolf had with Lincoln's subordinates. For instance, Wolf was arrested by LaFayette C. Baker, the chief of detectives in Washington, D.C., for being part of a "conspiratorial organization" that was allegedly involved in "spying and blockade running on behalf of the Confederacy." (Later, LaFayette was promoted to the position of head of the U.S. Secret Service.) Both General Grant and Baker reportedly looked at the B'nai B'rith as a "spy agency."(15) Perhaps, Wolf was involved in such activities because of Lincoln putting an end to slavery; or perhaps Wolf did it because Judah P. Benjamin in the South was a member of the Jewish Race, though a proselyte-Christian, and, consequently, Wolf felt more secure with the South. Some have suggested that Lincoln was despised by Jewish aristocrats because he produced "greenbacks," thereby making international financiers purposeless. It is difficult to speculate why, whatever the case.
If Grant was alone in his recognition of Jews being involved in traitorous activities and unscrupulous trade, his findings could be perhaps written off as mere fanaticism. However, he was not. And there was more than just LaFayette Baker. As noted in The Sherman Letters, Gen. William Sherman also said similar things when he was in Union-occupied Memphis, Tennessee, on July 30, 1862:
"I found so many Jews and speculators here trading in cotton, and secessionists had become so open in refusing anything but gold, that I have felt myself bound to stop it. The gold can have but one use--the purchase of arms and ammunition. . . . Of course, I have respected all permits by yourself of the Secretary of the Treasury, but in these new cases (swarms of Jews), I have stopped it."
There has been some speculation that Lincoln was assassinated as a result of Jewish hatred. If that was the case, he was not the last.
Huey Long, a pro-Gentile presidential candidate in the 1920s who had a good chance of being elected, was assassinated by the Jewish dentist Carl Weiss. It almost seems as if assassinations in America are part of a trend among Jews.
With regards to Kennedy's assassination, there was that strip club owner Jack Ruby who somehow was able to get close enough to shoot Lee Harvey Oswald. Oswald, who had once gave up his American citizenship and ran off to the Soviet Union at the height of Jewish Communism, was held in custody for killing Kennedy; and while being taken somewhere, Ruby comes out of nowhere with a loaded pistol and puts a bullet in Oswald--shortly after he had agreed to tell all. This shows there is much more to this issue than we know. Why would a strip club owner, not the typical person who seems like he would care too much, take this upon himself? How did Ruby know that Oswald would be coming out at that time and that entrance? How was Ruby able to get by security with a loaded gun? How was he able to get close enough to Oswald to shoot him at point-blank range? These are all good questions that need to be answered.(16) I don't think Kennedy cared too much for Israel's terrorist activities, and that might have made some Jews unhappy.
But, if Jews made Kennedy unhappy, he was hardly the first. Jews have been kicked out of nearly every civilization in the entire world. These are a few of the areas in which Jews have been expelled, noted as the areas they are known as today and followed by the year of the expulsion(s):
Africa (1147, 1790), Arabia (624), Austria (1298), Babylon (586BC), Bavaria (1551), Belgium (1370), Czechoslovokia (1745), Denmark (not allowed in until the 17th century), Egypt (1571BC, 38BC, 3BC, 66), England (not allowed in until the 12th century, expelled in 1290), France (561, 1182, 1242, 1306, 1394, 1540, 1682), Germany (1012, 1096, 1146, 1298, 1510, 1614, 1935-revoked citizenship), Hungary (1360, 1582, 1717), Italy (1492, 1540, 1550, 1846), Iraq (not allowed to emigrate to until 2003), Lebanon (Jews not allowed entrance), Palestine (70, 324), Lithuania (1495), Netherlands (1444), Norway (1814), Poland (1453, 1772-Pale of Settlement), Portugal (1498), Prussia (1510), Rome (315, 379), Russia (1772-Pale of Settlement, 1881), Saxony (1349), Slovakia (1380, 1744), Spain (612, 694, 1391, 1492-1968, officially), Sweden (until 1782), Switzerland (1939), Syria (Jews not allowed entrance).
Hence, we see that these "underground" feelings that are prevalent among Gentiles are not even isolated to America; they accurately reflect the entire world's feelings towards Jews throughout history. The reason for this is that Jews are generally "mean," for lack of a better all-inclusive term that adequately summarizes Jewish characteristics, though Jews are basically incapable of introspection and fail to recognize this inherent trait among them. Indeed, looking at WWII, it would not have even been caused if not for Jews. Jews had taken over Russia and had murdered 60 million Russians. Jews then tried to do the same with Germany, but failed miserably (at first). Today, about 60 years after the fact, they continuously feed the world pity-the-Jew-propaganda on a daily basis.
Many respectable Americans felt that Jews had indeed caused WWII (just as today many feel that they are at fault for the Iraq War). Joseph P. Kennedy, the father of America's Kennedy dynasty, who was a U.S. Ambassador in London prior to WWII, stated why England went to war:
"[British Prime Minister] Chamberlain stated that America and the world's Jews had forced England into the war."(17)
Indeed, during WWII, most Americans could have cared less for Jews. Hugh Wilson, the US Ambassador in Berlin until 1938, the year before the war broke out, found anti-Semitism in Germany "understandable." This was because before the advent of the National Socialists there, "the stage, the press, medicine and law [were] crowded with Jews...among the few with money to splurge, a high proportion [were] Jews ... the leaders of the Bolshevist movement in Russia, a movement desperately feared in Germany, were Jews. One could feel the spreading resentment and hatred."(18)
World War II hero General George Patton reflected many of America's leaders views of Jews. He described Jewish Displaced Persons as being "without any of the cultural or social refinements of our time." He found that many lacked morals common among others. "My opinion is that no people," said Gen. Patton, "could have sunk to the level of degradation these people have reached in the short space of four years."(19) Writing of the "Semitic revenge [planned by Morgenthau and Baruch] against all Germans," Gen. Patton promulgated:
"Harrison and his ilk believe that the displaced person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals."(20)
General Patton was hardly alone in those feelings. General MacArthur also felt similarly. Likewise, George Van Horn Moseley did too. George Van Horn Moseley was both a General of the United States and Deputy Secretary of State.
At one time, he had been asked to join the America First Committee (AFC). The following letter, which is Moseley's response to join the AFC, is reprinted in the book The 'Jewish Threat': Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army by Jewish author Joseph Bendersky. Similar to many others who are in or have been in the government, former General and Deputy Secretary of State George Van Horn Moseley was also concerned about Jewish influence. His voice still needs to be heard, and perhaps his lifting idea, which he wrote in all caps below, needs to be considered today. Differing from many others in this aspect, however, he was outspoken about his beliefs, not being a politician nor one to hide. His letter follows:
Atlanta, Georgia
October 23, 1940
Mr. R. Douglas Stuart, Jr., Director
America First Committee,
1806 Board of Trade Building,
Chicago, Illinois
Dear Mr. Stuart:
If I am to acknowledge the receipt of your letter dated October 11th, I must, in keeping with the principles which have always governed me, write you very frankly.
At the outset, I must say that I am happy to know that your organization has chosen such a vital mission. But I wonder if you realize the difficulties of such a campaign and the real strength of the enemy-and are you prepared to go to battle with him and with his tribe? A number of organizations have stared out bravely with a mission similar to yours, but too often they have melted away before the enemy.
I have had considerable experience on this subject, for I tried to arouse the American people from their apathy, pointing out the dangers confronting us as a nation. But I stated the truth too frankly and so, for many months now, my pen and my voice have been silenced.
Early in my endeavors, I received an invitation to speak before the Union League Club of Chicago, an organization I remember from boyhood, which always marched in step with the Republic. No date had been fixed but when the enemy went after me in the public press the heroic Union League Club evidently lost their nerve, and they did not renew their invitation.
What prevents America from being first today? Let me be frank and point out the enemy who would themselves be first in America today, and that is the Jewish nation, a nation within a nation. If you will investigate, as I have - crime, graft, filthy publications and unsavory movies, the liquor and drug traffic, the red light district, white slave traffic, and WAR - you will arrive head on against a pack of Jews in control.
I am not going to take your time to discuss in this letter the age old problem of the Jew, but if you are interested, you can get all the evidence concerning his plans for world domination from the writings of Jews, themselves. You do not have to rely on the statement of any Gentile. Suffice it to say, however, that they have been driven out of every country in which they have been domiciled, and for good reason, and EVENTUALLY THEY WILL BE DRIVEN OUT OF THE U.S.A. [Moseley's emphasis]
The Jew may tell you that there are only some four and a half million of them in the United States. The fact is there are over thirteen million of them in the United States today. Formerly I felt sorry for the Member of Congress who could not face this problem frankly on account of Jewish influence in his district, but now I find the influence of the Jew extends to every field. The banker, who may agree with me on principle just one hundred percent, dares not touch this problem, for some of his biggest depositors are Jews; many a lawyer will not face it for some of his big clients are Jews; the press cannot touch it, for so many of the big advertisers are Jews, and it is the advertiser who makes the paper pay. If we lack the character to face this problem squarely and solve it, we will experience the tragedy which overtook France.
I shall be glad to join your organization, assisting it as far as I am permitted to do so -
1. If you eliminate from your organization all Jews and all Jewish influences (they join all organizations and buy in or on both political parties; thus they keep themselves fully advised, and control or ruin);
2. If you will come out before the nation with a definite statement against the Jew and all he stands for, including the closing of our doors to all refugee Jews, of whatever nationality;
3. If you will take a definite stand against the control by Jews in local, state and national affairs;
4. If you will advocate the restoration of our REPUBLIC [Moseley's emphasis], bringing back the in the written and spoken language throughout the United States the words, "Republic, Christ and Christian".
If you will take the stand that I have suggested above, millions of Gentiles will rush to your banner. But if you fail to meet this issue squarely, your organization will accomplish nothing, except possibly to support a certain overhead, including perhaps several Jewish secretaries, placed with you for the purpose of spying upon you and your work.
You may not agree with me in what I have written above. Perhaps you will give this letter no consideration whatsoever, but may I ask you to preserve it, so that as the years roll by you may again read it, with the perspective of, say, ten to fifteen years. May I ask also that you make acknowledgement of it, for I plan to give copies of this letter to individuals over the land who know this problem and agree with me just one hundred percent.
Enclosed herewith is a copy of a letter inviting me to meet Mr. Lewis L. Strauss of Kuhn, Loeb & Company, and my reply.
Very sincerely yours,
George Van Horn Moseley
It has been many years since Moseley's comments. Since that time, Jews have gained nearly full control of America's government. Such power is clearly illustrated by former Illinois Congressman of 20 years Paul Findley's book They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions Confront Israel's Lobby. He tells about how Jewish plutocrats strongly influence America's policies, particularly with respect to Israel and the Mid-East. But this control is over much more than America's foreign policy with respect to Israel. Indeed, America has just gotten out of the Iraq War, which was caused due to Jewish influence.
Shall we allow America to continue to be taken by the hands of Jews, letting Jews lead America down the pathway towards apocalypse. Or shall we put an end to this control, and proclaim from the highest pulpit,
"Free at last! Thank God Almighty, Gentiles are free at last!"
____________________________________
NOTES:
1. Dinnerstein, Leonard, Anti-Semitism in America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).
2.) Dinnerstein, pp. 232-233.
3.) "The Haldeman Diaries" (N.Y.: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1994), p. 405.
4.) "The Generals and the Jews," Newsweek (November 25, 1974), p. 39.
5.) Also, see The 'Jewish Threat': Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army by Jewish author Joseph Bendersky (New York: Basic Books, 2000), pp. 428-429, for more about this particular controversy.
6.) The Writings of Benjamin Franklin, Vol. 8, The MacMillian Co., p. 332.
7.) Dinnerstein, p. 11; citing Diary of John Quincy Adams (Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1981), I, p. 59.
8.) Gerber, David, Anti-Semitism in American History (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1986), p. 59.
9.) Gerber, p. 59.
10.) Dinnerstein, p. 5; Letter to the Amsterdam Chamber of the Dutch West India Company from New Amsterdam, September 22, 1654; Harry Golden and Martin Rywell, The Jews in American History.
11.) Dinnerstein, pp. 5, 7, 11, 15, 17.
12.) Dinnerstein, p. 17, 18, 19.
13.) Dinnerstein, p. 8, 84.
14). Dinnerstein, p. 32.
15.) EIR, The Ugly Truth about the ADL (Washington, D.C.: Executive Intelligence Review, 1994), pp. 8-9.
16.) The fact that Ruby was able to get close enough to Oswald after he murdered President Kennedy--and Ruby knew where Oswald would be at a particular time--while carrying a loaded weapon speaks great deals in and of itself. There is a book written by Michael Piper, who works at the American Free Press, that mentions possible Jewish involvement in Kennedy's assassination, I am told, though I have not personally read it yet.
17.) The Forrestal Diaries, ed. Millis, Cassell, 1952, p. 129.
18.) Hugh Wilson: Diplomat between the Wars (Longmans, 1941), quoted by Leonard Mosley, Lindbergh (Hodder, 1976), p. 252.
19.) Bendersky, Joseph, The 'Jewish Threat': Anti-Semitic Politics of the U.S. Army (New York: Perseus Books, 2000), pp. 352-357
20.) Bendersky, p. 357
Return to Isolationism Strikes Again
by Mark Franklin on July 25, 2003 at 1:48 AM