George Mason University's
History News Network
New entry

Liberty & Power: Group Blog



Aeon J. Skoble
According to the news reports today, Bush says"In all of these proposals, we seek to provide not just a government program, but a path -- a path to greater opportunity, more freedom, and more control over your own life.” (I didn’t watch, I chose to spend the hour more productively, viz., drinking very old Port.) That sounds great! More freedom and more autonomy for the individual – why that’s just what I favor too! But really, is there any evidence that this is what we can expect? According to CNN, Bush “spoke of revamping Social Security to allow younger workers to set up"personal" accounts -- a proposal Democrats have criticized as opening the door toward privatization.” This single sentence encapsulates so much of my disillusionment with the two-party system: the Republicans talk about privatizing social security in half-measures, and then don’t do it anyway; and the Democrats criticize them for even talking about the half-measures! So neither party actually has any intention of letting me invest my own money for retirement. Those half-measures Bush mentioned last night were the same ones he mentioned four years ago, of course, and yet the system remains totally unchanged. My best guess is that, four years from now, it will still remain totally unchanged, regardless of who wins in November.

Why do they even have conventions, a friend of mine wrote to ask the other day. I said that they used to be for actual deliberation, and now it’s just a junket. (Just out of curiosity, do any of the historians here know when was the last time a nomination was sufficiently contested as to make the convention meaningful?).

So let’s see: neither Bush nor Kerry favors same-sex marriage, neither of them will make any steps whatsoever towards social-security reform nor significantly reform the tax code, neither will end ag or tobacco subsidies, both are trade protectionists, and they both favored the invasion of Iraq and the “Patriot Act.” Tell me again why it’s so important to vote?


Friday, September 3, 2004 - 10:13


Sheldon Richman
Something else from Zell Miller’s remarkable speech at the GOP convention. No comment needed:

And like you, I ask which leader is it today that has the vision, the willpower and, yes, the backbone to best protect my family?

The clear answer to that question has placed me in this hall with you tonight. For my family is more important than my party.

There is but one man to whom I am willing to entrust their future and that man's name is George Bush.

In the summer of 1940, I was an eight-year-old boy living in a remote little Appalachian valley.

Our country was not yet at war but even we children knew that there were some crazy men across the ocean who would kill us if they could.

President Roosevelt, in his speech that summer, told America"all private plans, all private lives, have been in a sense repealed by an overriding public danger."

I didn't watch the speech, but apparently the crowd went wild.

Thanks to Lew Rockwell for publicizing this.

Update: I've since watched the video online. For the record, there was no applause immediately after the Roosevelt quote. Applause came four lines later, after a reference to Wendell Wilkie, Roosevelt's 1940 Republican opponent:"And he [Wilkie] made it clear that he would rather lose the election than make national security a partisan campaign issue." It's fair to say that Roosevelt's hideous quotation got no enthusiastic response—in fact, no response at all—from the convention throng. (Why didn't they boo?) Video is here.


Friday, September 3, 2004 - 13:13


Matthew Barganier (Guest Blogger)
Could somebody drop me a line when the blogosphere's top legal eagle sees fit to comment on this?

Thursday, September 2, 2004 - 00:37


Gene Healy
From his speech last night:

Senator Kerry has made it clear that he would use military force only if approved by the United Nations.

Kerry would let Paris decide when America needs defending.

I want Bush to decide.

Me, I want Congress to decide--you know, like it says in the Constitution and everything. You'd think a United States senator might appreciate that distinction, but what can you expect from a screeching mediocrity whose previous claim to fame was spending taxpayers' money to distribute a free classical music CD to every new baby born in Georgia? Unprincipled, reflexively hawkish, and dim: Zell's found a home in the modern G.O.P.


Thursday, September 2, 2004 - 09:54


Matthew Barganier (Guest Blogger)
I hate to pick on Glenn Reynolds twice in one day – oh, who am I kidding? I love it – but check the 3rd graf of this for a lesson in Reynoldsian economics. Massive, assured demand leads to decreased supply? Also note how"generous" he is willing to be with your money.

Thursday, September 2, 2004 - 12:31


Matthew Barganier (Guest Blogger)
No wonder Richard Perle digs convicted embezzler Ahmed Chalabi so – they're two perps in a pod:
    Press tycoon Conrad M. Black and other top Hollinger International Inc. officials pocketed more than $400 million in company money over seven years and Black's handpicked board of directors passively approved many of the transactions, a company investigation concluded.

    A report by a special board committee singled out director Richard N. Perle, a former Defense Department official, who received $5.4 million in bonuses and compensation. The report said Perle should return the money to the Chicago-based company.
Please note that this is a company investigation, not a politically motivated waste of taxpayer money.
    The new report, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission late Monday, added details of what it called the" corporate kleptocracy" Black and Radler created at Hollinger. It said they treated the company as a"piggybank" and fashion accessory, with Black using the prestige of the newspapers to gain access to the wealthy, powerful and royal.

    For example, the report said Black and his wife, Barbara Amiel Black, treated the Hollinger corporate jet as a private shuttle between cities such as Chicago and Toronto and vacation spots. They took frequent trips to Palm Springs and one 33-hour round trip to Bora Bora, which cost the company $530,000, the report said. It also said Black charged the company $90,000 to refurbish a Rolls-Royce, and used $8 million in company money to buy memorabilia of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, about whom Black wrote a book.
Could that corporate-statist thief FDR have any better disciple?



Wednesday, September 1, 2004 - 00:23


Matthew Barganier (Guest Blogger)
After expropriating a big chunk of his work for an earlier post, it's only right that I direct your attention to Kevin Michael Grace's fundraiser. For a most unorthodox reading of pop culture and politics, be sure to check out his Punk Rock Revisionism I and II.

Wednesday, September 1, 2004 - 00:11


Steven Horwitz
My friend Glen Whitman is a sick man. He needs help and some hobbies. Quickly. Very quickly

Wednesday, September 1, 2004 - 17:16