American Martial Virtue?tags: American exceptionalism
William J. Astore, a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF), now teaches at the Pennsylvania College of Technology.
Cross-posted from Contrary Perspective.
Ever since the attacks of 9/11/2001, the United States has actively celebrated martial virtue. We’ve portrayed our troops as heroes. Presidents have celebrated them as the best led and best trained and most effective military in all of human history. To question the wisdom of such hagiographic portrayals is to be dismissed as ungenerous and un-American. Just ask the journalist Chris Hayes.
But the hard truth is that martial virtue is consistent both with republican freedoms and with imperial or despotic agendas, to include the suppression of freedom.
History teaches us that martial virtues (such as they are) are readily enlisted or perverted to serve imperial or even fascist regimes. Sparta celebrated military virtues even as they lived off of slavery and exposed the “weak” to death. The Romans, in ruthlessly pursuing an empire, created deserts and called them “peace,” to quote Tacitus, one of the great historians of Rome. Both under the Kaiser and under Hitler, Germany elevated martial virtues and waged two utterly devastating wars.
This is not to say that martial service can’t be ennobling. Organizing and fighting for what’s right is commendable. To cite just one example, think of the Jews who organized to resist the Nazis during World War II. Jewish partisans fought for a cause, for freedom from murderous oppression, a fight in which they found their “treasure,” the treasure of pure acts of will. In Hannah Arendt’s words (which she applied to the French resistance), “they had become ‘challengers,’ had taken the initiative upon themselves and therefore, without knowing or even noticing it, had begun to create that public space between themselves where freedom could appear.”
During World War II, Jewish (and other) resisters tapped the nobility of martial service, carving out public spaces where decisions were made freely for the purpose of defeating a regime dedicated to their destruction. Under these conditions, martial virtue upheld freedom.
Martial virtue, in other words, is not an oxymoron.
Did martial virtue help to make “the greatest generation” in America? No. It was the events that came before World War II, not the war itself, that “made” this generation. My dad, born in 1917, had to endure the Great Depression, had to serve in the Civilian Conservation Corps in the mid-1930s, had to work long hours in the factory prior to the war, to support the family. From this he learned the value of hard work and the reality that life often isn’t fair. His service in the Army during the war was a duty he performed to the best of his ability, but it was largely what he and his generation endured before the war, and the nation they built after the war, that made them “great.”
American troops during World War II were citizen-soldiers. Unseduced by Mars, the god of war, most of them endured the degradations of war without becoming degraded themselves. You can’t say the same of the German Wehrmacht or the Soviet Army.
And there’s the rub. Martial service is also consistent with totalitarian states. Indeed, such states take pains to celebrate the military in order to co-opt its honorable qualities for disreputable ends. Military service loses its nobility as it is monopolized by the state in the name of furthering anti-democratic agendas.
All of this is to say that the celebration of martial virtue is powerful — and powerfully dangerous. It may be consistent with protecting freedom, but so too may it be consistent with denying freedom.
Our nation’s founders knew this when they created a small “standing” military, placing it firmly under the control of Congress and a civilian commander-in-chief, augmented by state militias under the control of governors. Founders like James Madison warned us of the dangers of perpetual war and its corrosive impact on democratic principles. They were wise to do so.
And we would be wise to heed their counsel. We would be wise not to celebrate a military setting as being uniquely suited to creating “heroes.” And we would also be wise not to embrace martial qualities as being uniquely virtuous.
America is not exceptional when we commit to martial virtues; America is exceptional when we commit ourselves to liberty.
comments powered by Disqus
- So Cliven Bundy never said blacks might have been better off under slavery?
- Mussolini's birthplace in Italy to get a fascist museum
- Historical sex objects to feature in British classrooms
- All Russian World War I Documents Available Online
- Jihadists gone, masons are working to restore the mausoleums of Timbuktu
- Cultural historian who helped end censorship of "Lady Chatterley's Lover," dies
- Thomas Slaughter interviewed about his new book on the American Revolution
- Historian Michael Ignatieff writes a memoir explaining why he failed in politics
- Olivia Remie Constable, director of the Medieval Institute at Notre Dame since 2009, passes away
- Arizona Historical Society soon could be history